Agreed, but...
Posted by Stoner on 2010-06-26 14:26:06, SaturdayIn reply to And yet it might occur to some. posted by Webmaster on 2010-06-26 12:17:54, Saturday
|
...what would you define as problematic? Where does a boylover draw the line between what is problematic and what is not? I'll tell you where I draw the line: anything that points to me being a boylover is problematic. Therefore, just visiting sites like yours, BC, or looking at boy model or speedo pics linked from boylinks are things that I need to hide, which is why I use throwaway computing combined with encryption--to make it extremely difficult for anyone to uncover my online activities. That doesn't mean I'm breaking the law. It just means that I'm protecting myself from an irrational, yet universal hatred of people like myself, and that is something that I will continue to do without remorse. When society lumps all boylovers together as the worst of the worst, leaving no room or possibility for the law-abiding, truly good people among us, they leave us with no choice. As for the technical and practical aspects of the whole "freezing RAM" thing, I'm far from qualified to comment on it. I just thought that the article provided a decent "worst case scenario" in regards to the OP's questions. Thanks for keeping this forum online. It is unfortunate that you have come under suspicion as providing a place to assist people in hiding illegal activities, but little by little it seems that our very existence is becoming prohibited. It is for this reason that I think resources like yours are important, and why I feel no misgivings in utilizing and contributing to such resources. Stonehenge |
Follow ups: